BETA RELEASE
Skip to main content

Most major AI Model Producers score D or worse on FLI's 2025 AI Safety Index for Existential Threat

True High confidence 2026-05-10 Reviewed and approved by brandon-f
Independently verified At least one independent source corroborates this claim.

8 sources (1 independent, 7 unclassified)

Research process · 2026-05-11 · researcher, ingestor, analyst, auditor

Sources consulted

Models used

  • researcher: infomaniak:mistralai/Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-2512
  • ingestor: infomaniak:mistralai/Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-2512
  • analyst: greenpt:gpt-oss-120b
  • auditor: greenpt:gpt-oss-120b

Verdict check

Analyst: true (high)

Auditor: true (low)

Verdicts agree

Human review

Reviewed 2026-05-10 by brandon-f

Evidence Summary:

  • The Future of Life Institute’s Summer 2025 AI Safety Index reports that none of the evaluated companies scored above a D in the Existential Safety planning domain, indicating all received grades of D or lower (2025 AI Safety Index).
  • An independent article from Quantum Zeitgeist echoes this finding, stating that “No company achieved a score above a D in this domain for the second consecutive edition” (AI Safety Report: Top 3 Companies Outpace Rivals In Risk).
  • The index evaluates seven leading AI developers, including Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Meta, and others, which constitute the major AI model producers referenced in the claim (2025 AI Safety Index).

Conclusion: The claim that most major AI model producers score D or worse on the FLI 2025 AI Safety Index for Existential Threat is directly supported by both the primary FLI report and independent reporting, confirming that all assessed major producers received grades of D or lower.

No contradictory evidence was found.

Sources

Criterion: Most major ENTITY score D or worse on FLI's 2025 AI Safety Index for Existential Threat

Review cadence

This claim is reviewed every 60 days.